OUR PRESS
CAROL'S TWEETS
SEARCH OUR SITE

by tags:

or enter your search term below:

 

Receive our blog updates in your inbox!

It's super easy - just enter your email address in this box:

Email Address:

Subscribe to Our Updates

 

Receive our blog updates in your inbox!

It's as easy as entering your email address below:

Email Address:

Entries in licensing (17)

Thursday
Feb162012

Hear, Hear! What Brand Marketers Can Learn from "The Voice"

In Carol's latest article for the International Licensing Merchandiser's Association (LIMA), she reveals three lessons that brand marketers can learn from NBC's hit series, The Voice.

I’m addicted to NBC’s“The Voice.” There, I said it. But I’m not alone–the blind-judging song-fest has launched ahead of CBS’s reigning line-up of comedies by a 64 percent margin, is currently the highest-rated network show of the season and enjoys an enviable level of social-media engagement. The show’s better-than-“Idol” talent pool, genre-spanning panel of celebrity songbird coaches, and talent-before-looks hook provide plenty of reasons to give The Voice a listen. Personally, I can’t help but see it as a modern metaphor for brand marketer/retailer dynamics and see three lessons to be learned from the show:

Read the rest of the article

Tuesday
Feb072012

Riche Niches: No Time to Freak Over Media Fragmentation

In Carol's latest article for the International Licensing Merchandiser's Association (LIMA), she explains why brand marketers can't afford to be freaked out by media fragmentation.

Just when you thought the cost of television airtime couldn’t climb any higher, thirty-second spots for last Sunday’s Super Bowl XLVI clocked in at a record average of $3.5 million. Although stratospheric, these bucks came with a huge bang, as the NFL anticipated scoring its largest television audience ever with a projected viewership of more than 111 million. While the go-big-or-go-home spend for primetime Super Bowl ads is a top story every February, it’s the NFL’s decision to stream the game live online for the first time that may provide the most interesting subtext from Sunday’s game.

In recent years, the NFL, like many brands, has been aggressive in its efforts to expand globally. By streaming the action online, it will open the door to millions of fans abroad and allow social media to play an even larger role across its viewership. That’s a stark contrast from the days when brands built value by funneling fans’ rapt attention into a single medium. How well the mindshare game is played across different platforms will set the tone for media spends for the rest of the year — and not just for the NFL.

Read the rest of the article

Monday
Jan232012

To Be or Not to Be, That Used to Be the Question.

Back in the late eighties, I signed up for what seemed to be a terrific promotion and relocated to the West Coast. My new role had me managing multi-million-dollar businesses with what were considered the country’s premier department stores at the time. Remember Buffum’s, Emporium Capwell, Robinson’s, and Liberty House? The massive consolidation that soon followed my move might explain any memory lapses. All vanished without a trace through complete liquidation or acquisition. None of the banners were seen as having intrinsic value and, at the time, any private brands in their stables were private labels in the literal sense – they were interchangeable. Real brand equity came from national and licensed brands.

Back then, a retailer or brand was either in business, soldiering on under the same general business model, or it wasn’t. A lot has changed over the past decade.

Companies now have the potential to live on (and on) through deconstruction. The “parts” (intellectual property in the form of brands or technology, real estate holdings) are becoming more significant than the whole (the banner as it has traditionally operated). This past week offered a couple of field days for the media’s Monday morning quarterbacks as Kodak’s bankruptcy announcement and heated speculation that Sears will go private hit. Pundits wasted no time hyping their hindsight -- Kodak missed the boat on digital, Sears (a retailer!) has forgotten about its stores, yada, yada, yada. Leaving aside the fact that there are valid counter-arguments against both opinions, something far more interesting is at work.

Double Lives

Over the past several years, Kodak has dutifully launched marketing campaigns and incrementally-improved products, even as it lived a double life as a highly litigious patent troll. Seemingly undistracted by its imminent bankruptcy announcement, as recently as last week the company filed a patent infringement suit against Samsung over various image distribution capabilities and the week prior, similar suits were launched against HTC, Apple, and Fujifilm.

Kodak has long relied on its intellectual property as a source of cash. Although its licensing revenue has dwindled from the $3 billion it achieved between 2003 and 2010 to only $98 million last year, with its IP portfolio recently valued at as much as $2.6 billion and its 11,000 patents valued at $1 billion, it’s easy to understand the company’s ongoing vigilance.

Part and Parcel

The upshot is that Kodak’s future may see it selling off its camera unit and perhaps some of its patents in order to generate revenue that could be invested, not necessarily in its manufacturing capabilities or getting its products placed on shelves, but in further patent litigation and licensing development. Another scenario might have Kodak selling off its intellectual property piece by piece, over a period of years. It may not look anything like the Kodak of the past, but will that make it less relevant or just different?

Hedge fund manager Eddie Lampert bought 53% of Kmart while it was in bankruptcy and, in 2004, helped engineer Kmart’s purchase of Sears. The merger was completed the following year.Since that time, Mr. Lampert has embarked on a series of quite un-merchant-like but influential initiatives, including the 2009 launch of an online marketplace that would open up its platform to third-party sellers. Walmart’s far more limited marketplace launch happened more or less simultaneously and since that time, many more have joined the party.

Asphalt Assets

His asset monetization moves would seem to be predictable, given Mr. Lampert’s background, but the manifestations have nonetheless surprised many. Through its real estate arm’s website, Sears has listed nearly 4,000 of its Kmart and namesake stores that have space available for other merchants or retailers to lease. Retailers as disparate as Forever 21, Whole Foods, Gonzales Grocery Store, and Western Athletic Clubs Inc. have signed on for space and, leaving no asphalt asset unturned, the company is even offering parking lot space to auto repair shops.

But perhaps no maneuver has made more waves than Sears’ ongoing decisions to distribute, or license, its high-equity private brands to wholesalers and other retailers. Back in 2007, Sears created a $1.8 billion entity to house its top three brands, DieHard, Craftsman, and Kenmore, which at the time was heralded as the biggest “securitization” of intellectual property in history, although few took much notice of the long-term implications. It grabbed my attention because to me, it portended Sears taking its brands into new venues (something that Sears has since referred to as “externalizing” its brands). Since that time, Sears has inked highly-publicized deals with Ace Hardware and Costco for Craftsman tools and with Meijer for DieHard batteries (wholesale deals have also been struck for the Craftsman brand).

IP in Perpetuity

Considering that even middling brands can spawn hundreds of fine-sliced brand licensing agreements, as well as hundreds more when category extensions are explored, Sears’ current deals should be seen as the tip of the brand asset monetization iceberg. Should Mr. Lampert take Sears private, he will be able to pursue any number of far-flung brand ventures and property parcel-offs without worrying about Wall Street’s scrutiny.This could go on for quite some time, regardless of the physical condition of its stores.

In the meantime, other retailers such as Office Max have jumped on the brand externalizing bandwagon (and, take it from me, many others are actively discussing the possibility).

A recent article about Sears’ current situation ended by speculating that the company may cease to be a retailer within five years. To be or not to be?

Planning your 2012 direct-to-retail strategy? Pulling together your 2012 sales, marketing or licensing summit? Contact Carol directly to discuss how she can bring these and other insights to your teams.

Tuesday
Dec202011

Earth-shattering Events that Escaped (Almost) Everyone in 2011

In Carol's latest article for the International Licensing Merchandiser's Association (LIMA), Carol calls out a couple of retail developments that barely made a ripple and gives her take on how they will transform retail in 2012 and beyond.

Global Power Launches State-of-the-art Satellite

Grabble, Kosmix, OneRiot…What may sound like adult parlor games are actually a series of acquisitions made by Walmart under its newly-formed @WalmartLabs division. Headed up by the braniacs that came as a part of the bargain when Walmart acquired Kosmix back in April, @WalmartLabs has already more than made up for any of the virtual time that Walmart lost futzing with its physical assets during the much-maligned Project Impact era. A Facebook-mining gifting app and all manner of personalized shopping and couponing capabilities have already been conjured up.

Make no mistake though, the steady stream of incubation and innovation coming out of this lab isn’t just transforming Walmart’s “social web” trajectory, but raising the social, mobile, and big data bar for everyone in the retail orbit.

Read the rest of the article